Taken from the Subway: The Professor Who Wrote the Wrong Dissertation

The Last Class

March 12, 1956. Manhattan, New York.

At 9:20 in the evening, a forty-year-old professor finishes conducting a graduate seminar on Latin American government in Hamilton Hall at Columbia University. A student offers him a ride. The professor declines part of the way, then enters the subway at 57th Street and Eighth Avenue at approximately 10:00 p.m. He is carrying a dark brown briefcase and wearing a dark gray overcoat and a gray-green fedora.

**He is never seen again.**

Five days later, when he is reported missing, investigators find his apartment on Fifth Avenue undisturbed. His clothing, money, papers, and personal belongings are all in place. There is no sign of a struggle, no note, no indication he planned to leave. But there is something else: **an unsigned will and testament**, left with instructions that if anything should happen to him, the authorities should look no further than the Dominican consulate in New York.

His name is **Jesus Maria de Galindez Suarez**. He is a Basque exile, a Columbia University lecturer in international law, the United States delegate of the Basque Government-in-exile, a confidential FBI informant designated NY-507, and — most dangerously — the author of a 750-page doctoral dissertation titled *The Era of Trujillo*, the most comprehensive scholarly account ever written of the Dominican dictator Rafael Leonidas Trujillo and his regime of terror.

The dissertation had been formally accepted by Columbia's faculty committee on February 27, 1956 — **Dominican Independence Day**. Trujillo considered this a supreme personal insult. Thirteen days later, the professor vanished from the earth.

---

The Man Who Knew Too Much

Jesus de Galindez was born on October 12, 1915, in Amurrio, in the Basque province of Araba, Spain. The son of an eye doctor, he studied law in Madrid and joined the Basque Nationalist Party in 1932 at the age of seventeen. When the Spanish Civil War erupted in 1936, Galindez fought on the Republican side. He served as Legal Attache to the Basque Nationalist Party's Committee-Delegation in Madrid and headed the **Section of Prisoners and the Disappeared** for the Basque Government — a grim role that placed him at the intersection of intelligence, political violence, and human rights from his earliest professional years.

When Franco won in 1939, Galindez fled. He arrived in Ciudad Trujillo — now Santo Domingo — in the Dominican Republic, where a community of Spanish Republican exiles had settled. For six years, from 1939 to 1945, he lived and worked under Trujillo's regime, teaching legal science at the University of Santo Domingo and serving as the Basque Government's diplomatic representative in the Caribbean.

**He saw everything.** He saw the labor exploitation on the sugar plantations. He saw the apparatus of surveillance and repression operated by the Servicio de Inteligencia Militar. He saw the mechanisms by which Trujillo maintained absolute control: the informant networks that penetrated every neighborhood, the midnight arrests, the bodies that washed up on shorelines. And he documented what he saw.

By 1945, Galindez's investigations into labor conditions and his political activities had attracted the attention of Trujillo's intelligence services. He left the Dominican Republic before he could be silenced, arriving in New York City in 1946. At Columbia University, he began transforming his years of observation into scholarship.

The resulting dissertation, *La era de Trujillo: un estudio casuistico de dictadura hispanoamericana*, was not a polemic. It was a **rigorously analytical, 750-page examination** of how Trujillo's dictatorship functioned — its mechanisms of control, its economic structures, its international relationships, its methods of repression. Galindez discussed Trujillo's accomplishments alongside his crimes. The work remains, seventy years later, one of the most authoritative accounts of the regime ever written.

But scholarly rigor did not protect its author. A Dominican consular officer in New York obtained information about the dissertation and wrote to Trujillo, warning that it would attack the dictator and his family. **Trujillo's agents offered Galindez $25,000 to buy the manuscript.** Galindez refused.

In the weeks before his disappearance, Galindez told his graduate seminar that he was being targeted by the regime. He told colleagues he expected to be killed. He prepared his unsigned will. He also knew that on the night of his disappearance, two Dominican ships were docked in New York Harbor — one of which put out to sea that very night and returned after five hours, the other leaving shortly after. Whether the ships played a role in the operation or were a coincidence has never been established, but Galindez was aware that Dominican military assets shadowed him wherever he went. He continued teaching.

---

The Operation

What happened on the night of March 12, 1956, was reconstructed over the following months and years by the FBI, the New York Police Department, Life magazine, Congressional investigators, and — much later — FOIA litigation against the CIA. The reconstruction is detailed and horrifying.

**General Arturo Espaillat**, the chief of Dominican military intelligence and one of the most lethal operatives in the Western Hemisphere, personally organized the kidnapping. Espaillat found an American pilot named **Gerald Lester Murphy**, a twenty-three-year-old from Eugene, Oregon, whose single-minded ambition to fly had been frustrated by poor eyesight. Murphy was offered a contract to fly charters for the Compania Dominicana de Aviacion, the Dominican state airline. In early 1956, he was given a specific assignment: fly a charter from the United States to the Dominican Republic.

On March 12, Murphy rented a twin-engine Beechcraft aircraft and landed it at **Zahn's Airport in Amityville, Long Island**. He had installed extra fuel tanks on the aircraft — modifications consistent with a long, non-stop flight over water. That evening, as Galindez descended into the subway at 57th Street, a team of Trujillo's agents was waiting.

**Galindez was abducted, forced into a private ambulance at gunpoint, and drugged.** The ambulance drove to Amityville. Late that night, airport personnel observed a stretcher being carried from the ambulance to Murphy's waiting aircraft. The body on the stretcher was unconscious. A peculiar chemical odor — consistent with sedation — hung in the air.

Murphy flew the plane south through the night, stopping to refuel at **West Palm Beach, Florida**. He then flew on to **Monte Cristi**, a small airfield on the northern coast of the Dominican Republic. There, another pilot — **Octavio Antonio de la Maza**, a Dominican military officer and CDA copilot — took over for the final leg to **Ciudad Trujillo**.

At the Casa de Caoba, Trujillo's personal residence, the drugged professor was brought before the dictator. According to accounts that surfaced after Trujillo's assassination in 1961, **Trujillo carried Galindez's dissertation in one hand and a riding crop in the other.** He demanded that Galindez eat the document. When the professor refused, Trujillo beat him.

What followed was torture. The most widely cited account — corroborated by multiple Dominican sources after the fall of the regime — holds that Galindez was **suspended by rope and lowered inch by inch into a vat of boiling water**. His remains were then reportedly fed to sharks off the Dominican coast.

**His body has never been found.** Alternative accounts suggest he was shot and buried in an unmarked grave near San Jose de Ocoa. One account claims the body was retrieved from the sea and buried inland. No physical remains have ever been recovered by any investigation, and no excavation has been attempted at any of the alleged burial sites.

---

The Chain of Murders

The kidnapping of Galindez set in motion a sequence of cover-up killings that is among the most systematic in Cold War history. Over the nine months following March 12, 1956, **at least six additional people connected to the operation were eliminated**:

**The mechanic** at the Amityville airfield who observed the stretcher being loaded onto Murphy's plane was scheduled to testify under oath about what he had seen. **He died in an airplane crash six days before his testimony.** The crash was never independently investigated.

**Two airport employees** at the Dominican Republic end of the route who had witnessed the arrival of the drugged passenger were killed under circumstances that were never formally investigated by Dominican authorities.

**A nurse** who had administered the sedative in the ambulance was eliminated.

**A colonel** in the Dominican security services who had coordinated logistics for the operation was killed.

And then there was **Gerald Murphy himself**.

By late 1956, Murphy had begun talking. He told his fiancee — a Pan American Airways stewardess named Sally Caire — that he had flown a drugged man from New York to the Dominican Republic on the night of March 12. He was due to fly home to the United States in December 1956. On December 3, he mentioned a 5:00 p.m. appointment at the **National Palace** in Ciudad Trujillo. He left his apartment at 4:00 p.m.

His Ford automobile was found the next day, abandoned near a cliff overlooking the sea. **Gerald Lester Murphy was never seen again.** He was twenty-three years old.

---

The Staged Suicide

The Dominican government needed to account for Murphy's disappearance, particularly after the United States Congress — prompted by Oregon Congressman **Charles Porter** — began demanding answers about the missing American pilot.

**Octavio de la Maza**, the Dominican copilot who had flown the final leg of Galindez's abduction flight, was arrested. He was held incommunicado and pressured to confess that he had killed Murphy in self-defense during a homosexual encounter — a claim designed to discredit the victim and close the investigation simultaneously.

De la Maza refused to cooperate.

On January 7, 1957, guards at the prison announced that de la Maza had **hanged himself in his cell at 4:00 a.m.**, leaving behind a suicide note confessing to Murphy's killing. The note described a romantic encounter that ended in a struggle near the sea.

FBI investigators who examined the death found three critical problems:

1. De la Maza was too tall to hang himself from the showerhead from which he was found suspended.
2. The showerhead was too flimsy to have supported his body weight long enough to cause death by strangulation.
3. The handwriting in the suicide note was a forgery.

The U.S. government formally communicated to the Dominican government that it did not consider the Murphy case resolved. The Dominican government ignored the communication.

De la Maza's death had one consequence that Trujillo could not have anticipated. **Antonio de la Maza**, Octavio's elder brother, became convinced that the regime had murdered his brother. He joined the conspiracy against Trujillo. On May 30, 1961, Antonio de la Maza was among the gunmen who ambushed and assassinated Trujillo on a highway outside Ciudad Trujillo. Standing over the dictator's bullet-riddled body, Antonio reportedly murmured: **"This hawk won't kill any more chickens."** Then he shot Trujillo in the face.

---

The American Failure

The investigation of Galindez's disappearance is a study in institutional paralysis when national security interests collide with criminal justice.

The **New York Police Department** opened a missing persons investigation. It went nowhere. The FBI, which had a direct institutional relationship with Galindez — he was one of their informants — conducted an investigation that confirmed the broad outline of the kidnapping but produced no prosecutable case, because the crime had been committed by agents of a foreign government operating on American soil under diplomatic cover.

The **FBI's investigation** did establish key facts: Murphy had indeed flown from Amityville on the night of March 12; the plane had refueled in Florida; Galindez had been transported to the Dominican Republic. But the FBI could not compel cooperation from Dominican authorities, and the Eisenhower administration was unwilling to create a diplomatic crisis with Trujillo over the case.

**Why?** Because in 1956, Trujillo was an American ally. The Dominican Republic was positioned as a bulwark against Communist expansion in the Caribbean. The CIA maintained a station in Ciudad Trujillo that was, by some accounts, **second in size only to the station in Saigon**. Trujillo had cultivated relationships with influential American politicians, businessmen, and lobbyists. He had wined and dined senators and congressmen. American companies had substantial investments in Dominican sugar, mining, and real estate.

The cost of pursuing justice for one kidnapped professor was, in the Cold War calculus of 1956, measured against the strategic value of a compliant anti-Communist regime ninety miles from Cuba. Influential American politicians had been wined and dined by Trujillo at his personal estates. American sugar companies depended on Dominican labor conditions that Galindez had documented and criticized. The calculus was not close.

The Morris Ernst Whitewash

Trujillo's response to the growing international pressure was not to cooperate with the investigation but to **buy a counter-narrative**. He hired the New York public relations firm **Sydney S. Baron & Company**, which in turn engaged **Morris Ernst**, a prominent New York attorney and civil liberties figure, to conduct an "independent investigation" of Galindez's disappearance.

Ernst traveled to the Dominican Republic. In May 1958, he produced a report that **cleared the Trujillo regime of any involvement** in the kidnapping. The report suggested that Galindez had absconded voluntarily — perhaps to spend the approximately $500,000 he had collected as the U.S. representative of the Basque Government-in-exile.

The FBI, which had its own investigation file, dismissed the Ernst report. The American press treated it with contempt. But it served its purpose: it provided Trujillo with an American document, authored by a respected American lawyer, that could be cited in diplomatic exchanges. Trujillo reportedly spent **six million dollars** on the overall effort to discredit Galindez, rehabilitate his own image, buy off witnesses, and suppress the investigation.

The CIA Question

The most disturbing unresolved dimension of the Galindez case is the role of the Central Intelligence Agency.

CIA Inspector General **Lyman Kirkpatrick** admitted to journalists in 1960 that Galindez had been a **CIA informant**. The Agency has never formally confirmed or denied this. Author Stuart McKeever, in a federal FOIA lawsuit filed against the CIA, alleged that **a CIA agent on Trujillo's payroll directed the kidnapping** of Galindez — meaning that the same intelligence service that was receiving Galindez's reports may have facilitated his murder.

The FBI released more than **10,000 pages** of records on the Galindez case. The CIA has released almost nothing. FOIA requests and litigation have produced minimal disclosure. The Agency's position has been, and remains, that its operational records relating to Galindez are protected by national security classification.

This raises an extraordinary question: **Did the CIA know in advance that Trujillo intended to kidnap Galindez — an American resident, an FBI informant, and a CIA source — from American soil?** If so, did the Agency alert the FBI? Did it attempt to prevent the operation? Or did it stand aside because Galindez's dissertation threatened to destabilize a regime that the Agency needed as an anti-Communist asset?

No declassified document answers these questions. The silence is the answer.

---

Cultural Afterlife

Galindez's disappearance did not silence his work. Columbia University awarded him his **doctorate in absentia**. His dissertation, published as *The Era of Trujillo*, became an **overnight bestseller throughout Latin America**, going through seven printings. The book that Trujillo killed to suppress became the definitive account of his regime — more widely read in death than it ever would have been had Galindez lived to defend it in an academic committee room.

The case entered literature. **Manuel Vazquez Montalban** wrote the novel *Galindez* in 1991, later adapted into the 2003 Spanish film *El misterio Galindez*. **Mario Vargas Llosa** discussed the case extensively in *The Feast of the Goat* (2000), his novel about the Trujillo regime. **Julia Alvarez** referenced the disappearance in *In the Time of the Butterflies* (1994). **Junot Diaz** footnoted it in *The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao* (2007). Ana Diez directed a documentary, *Galindez*, in 2002.

Edward R. Murrow devoted an entire CBS radio program to the case, going to extraordinary lengths to protect the identities and voices of informants who feared for their lives.

Streets in **Bilbao, Spain**, and **Mar del Plata, Argentina**, bear his name.

---

Where It Stands Now

The case of Jesus de Galindez remains formally open with the New York Police Department. No one has ever been charged. No body has ever been recovered.

The FBI's investigation file — more than 10,000 pages — is the most comprehensive documentary record of the case. It establishes the mechanism of the kidnapping, the chain of cover-up murders, and the identity of the regime officials who organized the operation. What it does not establish, because the FBI could not compel Dominican or CIA cooperation, is the full chain of command and the extent of American complicity.

The CIA's file on Galindez remains substantially classified. Stuart McKeever's FOIA litigation, and subsequent requests by researchers and journalists, have produced fragments but not the operational core of what the Agency knew, when it knew it, and what it did or failed to do.

In 2018, the CUNY Dominican Studies Institute published **Professor Galindez: Disappearing from Earth**, the most comprehensive modern investigation, examining how "a kidnapping in the midst of American democracy went unsolved."

The questions that remain:

• Where is the body? Claims that Galindez was buried near San Jose de Ocoa have never been verified by excavation. The shark disposal account, if true, eliminates the possibility of physical recovery.
• What does the CIA file contain? The operational records of the CIA's Ciudad Trujillo station from 1955-1956 would establish definitively whether the Agency had advance knowledge of the kidnapping plot.
• Who authorized the ambulance? The ambulance used to transport Galindez from the subway to the Amityville airfield was a private vehicle operating in Manhattan. Its ownership, rental, and operational history have never been established in the public record.
• What happened to the $6 million? Trujillo reportedly spent six million dollars on the cover-up. The recipients of that money — American politicians, lawyers, journalists, and lobbyists — have never been fully identified.

Seventy years after Jesus de Galindez walked into the subway at 57th Street, every institution that could resolve this case — the CIA, the Dominican government, the NYPD — has chosen not to. The professor wrote the truth about a dictator. The dictator killed the professor. And the democracy that was supposed to protect him stood aside.

The Galindez case is not primarily a whodunit. The identity of the perpetrator — Rafael Trujillo and his intelligence apparatus — has been established beyond reasonable dispute since the late 1950s. The case is instead a study in three phenomena that define Cold War political violence: the **extraterritorial reach of dictatorial intelligence services**, the **complicity of democratic governments in covering up crimes committed by strategic allies**, and the **systematic elimination of witnesses as a method of evidence destruction**.

The operational sophistication of the kidnapping deserves close analysis. Trujillo's SIM executed an abduction on American soil that required: agents positioned at or near a Manhattan subway station, a private ambulance with medical personnel capable of sedating the victim, coordination with a pilot at a private airfield on Long Island, a multi-leg international flight with refueling stops, and a reception operation in the Dominican Republic. This is not the work of thugs. It is a **military intelligence operation conducted in the territory of the world's most powerful nation**, and it succeeded. The FBI was unable to prevent it, despite Galindez being one of their own informants.

The **chain of cover-up murders** is where the case becomes structurally extraordinary. At least six people connected to the operation were killed in the nine months following the kidnapping — the pilot, the copilot (staged as suicide), the mechanic (killed in a suspicious crash days before testimony), the nurse, two airport workers, and a security services colonel. This is not a cover-up in the conventional sense. It is the **systematic destruction of the evidentiary chain** by eliminating every human being who could testify to any link in it. Trujillo's intelligence service treated witnesses the way a competent forensic team treats physical evidence: they catalogued it, assessed its risk, and destroyed it methodically.

The **Morris Ernst investigation** deserves particular scrutiny as a case study in how authoritarian regimes weaponize the credibility of democratic institutions. Ernst was not a marginal figure. He was a prominent civil liberties attorney with a national reputation. By hiring him through a public relations intermediary, Trujillo obtained something more valuable than a favorable report: he obtained **the appearance of due process conducted by a credible American lawyer**. The fact that the FBI and the American press immediately dismissed the report is less important than the fact that it existed. In diplomatic correspondence, a whitewash by an American attorney carries more weight than a denial by a foreign dictator.

The **CIA dimension** is where the case becomes most disturbing and most relevant to contemporary discussions of intelligence accountability. Galindez was simultaneously an FBI informant and, according to CIA Inspector General Kirkpatrick, a CIA informant. He was also the target of a kidnapping operation organized by the intelligence service of a country where the CIA maintained one of its largest Western Hemisphere stations. The mathematical probability that the CIA had no advance intelligence about the operation is vanishingly small. The Agency monitored Trujillo's SIM closely. It had penetrated the Dominican government at multiple levels. The notion that a major SIM operation on American soil — involving the rental of aircraft, the positioning of an ambulance, the sedation of a target, and a multi-stop international flight — was invisible to the CIA station that was tracking the SIM's every significant operation is not credible.

The most likely explanation is the most uncomfortable one: the CIA knew, and chose not to act, because Galindez's dissertation threatened to destabilize a strategically valuable relationship. In 1956, with Cuba not yet lost to revolution, the Dominican Republic was a cornerstone of American anti-Communist strategy in the Caribbean. A professor's life was not worth a station.

The **legacy paradox** of the case is worth noting. Trujillo's objective was to suppress Galindez's dissertation. The kidnapping and murder achieved the opposite. Columbia awarded the doctorate posthumously. The dissertation was published and became a bestseller throughout Latin America — going through seven printings, reaching an audience orders of magnitude larger than any academic thesis would normally attract. The killing inspired novels by Vargas Llosa and Vazquez Montalban, a documentary, and a feature film. Galindez in death became exactly what Trujillo feared: an unkillable witness. The dictator spent six million dollars to erase a man whose name is now on streets in two countries, while Trujillo's own legacy is synonymous with barbarism.

The **John J. Frank trial** in November 1956 is an underexamined piece of the evidentiary record. Frank was tried as an unregistered agent of the Dominican government, and his testimony provided key details about the regime's surveillance of Galindez, the purchase offer for the manuscript, and the decision to escalate from bribery to abduction. This trial record exists in federal court archives and has never been fully digitized or cross-referenced against the FBI's investigation file. A systematic comparison of the Frank testimony with the FBI file could establish new connections between the Dominican intelligence network in New York and the operational team that executed the kidnapping.

This is the structural lesson of the case: **dictatorships can kill people, but they cannot kill information.** The dissertation survived because it had already been submitted. The truth survived because Galindez had distributed it before they took him.